Since the late 1990s there has been a fall in smoking among 11-15 year olds after at least two decades of little change. Children are more likely to smoke if their parents smoke and parents' attitude to smoking is also an important factor.
Youth Smoking
Most smokers take up smoking before the age of 18. Children whose parents or siblings smoke are around three times more likely to smoke than other children.
Most smokers take up smoking before the age of 18. Children whose parents or siblings smoke are around three times more likely to smoke than children living in non-smoking households.
Although around 60% of teenagers report that they have never smoked, among those who do experiment with smoking many become addicted to nicotine and continue to smoke as adults.
The effectiveness of youth-focused health education is limited and at best appears to delay the age of starting to smoke. It appears that the best way of reducing youth smoking is to have comprehensive tobacco control policies in place that apply to the whole population.
Danger! PR in the Playground: Tobacco industry youth anti-smoking programmes
October 2000: Tobacco companies such as British American Tobacco and Philip Morris have adopted a public posture of opposition to teenage smoking and even funded anti-smoking initiatives for teenagers. But an investigation by ASH and The Cancer Research Campaign has revealed that this is no more than a sinister and cynical public relations strategy. The purpose is to fend off meaningful restrictions on tobacco advertising and gain PR advantage, while proposing only measures that are unlikely to reduce youth smoking and likely make it more attractive by positioning cigarettes as an adult product and smoking as rebellious.
Since the late 1990s there has been a fall in smoking among 11-15 year olds after at least two decades of little change. Children are more likely to smoke if their parents smoke and parents' attitude to smoking is also an important factor.
June 2002: Presentation (36 slides) based on Danger! PR in the playground with graphic examples of youth smoking initiatives and evidence from tobacco industry documents.
ASH’s response to the Government consultation on under-age sales of tobacco. ASH supports the proposal to raise the minimum age from 16 to 18 and favours a positive licensing system to reduce illegal sales.
This review of youth smoking prevention campaigns finds that few that have made much difference apart from, at best, a delay in the onset of smoking.
This briefing was presented at the negotiating meetings on the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in Geneva. It explains why Big Tobacco's involvement in youth smoking prevention is such a disingenous initiative.
October 2002: ASH and organisations representing the three major health networks (heart, lung, and cancer) wrote an open letter to Big Tobacco, instructing the tobacco companies to stop running their mendacious Youth Smoking Prevention (YSP) programmes. The open letter coincided with the release of a WHO briefing slamming the tobacco companies involvement in YSP.
June 2002: ASH's response to British American Tobacco's 'stakeholder dialogue' and its social reporting. We explain exactly why BAT is irresponsible and unethical - and it's much more than merely selling deadly products.
This paper compares a tobacco industry campaign with a public health campaign.
British American Tobacco, Philip Morris and Japan Tobacco pay £2.4 million in advertising campaign on MTV aimed at persuading young people not to smoke. Why would they want to do this? This ASH reports looks at the reasons behind this campaign.
Russian translation of the summary of the Danger! PR in the playground report.
Mandarin translation of the Danger! PR in the playground report
Spanish translation of the Danger! PR in the Playground report.
Summary of the Danger! PR in the playground report in Arabic.
German translation of the Danger! PR in the playground report.
French translation of the Danger! PR in the playground report.
These are typical images used by the Tobacco Industry for their youth smoking initiatives.
Tobacco companies have adopted a public posture of opposition to teenage smoking. This report reveals why this stance amounts to little more than a sinister and cynical public relations strategy.
Focus group research with kids ages 10-15 testing some tobacco industry ideas on youth smoking. Six qualitative discussion groups.
Health Development Agency report on how best to approach smoking cessation (not prevention) for young people. Asks the question: should we do more to help young people stop smoking?
Paper prepared for the World Health Organization conference on tobacco and youth – Singapore 1999.
Summary by Australia's David Hill of the arguments in favour of adult smoking cessation rather than primary youth prevention measures as the best use of scarce resources in tobacco control. From Tobacco Control 1999 ;8:333-335.
This section of the ASH website contains a variety visual resources come from many sources. Note that ASH does not own these images and cannot grant formal permission for their use.
By Secker-Walker RH, Gnich W, Platt S, Lancaster T. Since smoking behaviour is determined by social context, the best way to reduce the prevalence of smoking may be to use community-wide programmes which use multiple channels to provide reinforcement, support and norms for not smoking. 22 April 2002
The authors conclude: Given the limited resources available for tobacco control, as well as the expense of conducting youth access programmes, tobacco control advocates should abandon this strategy and devote the limited resources that are available towards other interventions with proven effectiveness. Fichtenberg and Glantz. Pediatrics Vol 109. No 6. June 2002.
A thoughtful editorial in the journal Tobacco Control. The author says: we have to be willing to acknowledge when we have lost our way and humble ourselves enough to ask for directions. Too often advocates have chosen to forge ahead as if we actually knew where we were going. The result has been to continue down paths that were not productive simply because we did not want to be wrong. Sutton C. Tobacco Control 2000: 9 (Spring)
This links to the section on the ASH website on school resources. ASH does not produce resource strictly for use by schools. Our publications can be used (such as Facts at a glance and Essential Information on). We have provided links to other organisation and websites that do provide resources specifically for schools to use.
Roy Castle Lung Foundation's Youth Advocacy Project. The website is run by young people for young people.
By A Sowden and L Stead. There is limited support for the effectiveness of community interventions in helping prevent the uptake of smoking in young people. 20 Jan 2003
A report by the Canadian Cancer Society reveal that very few access interventions have any impact on youth smoking rates. The document: A critical analysis of youth access laws, examines the effectiveness of laws in reducing youth access to tobacco and their impact, if any, on smoking behaviour. Health Canada’s Ministerial Advisory Committee on Tobacco Control used the Society’s analysis as the foundation for its report entitled: Challenging Conventional Wisdom on Youth Access to Tobacco: Redefining Youth Access Interventions. This report recommends that the focus of the current laws move away from retailer compliance and move towards decreasing the social acceptability of providing tobacco to young people.
The authors conclude: youth smoking prevention and control efforts have had mixed results. Several types of strategies warrant additional attention and evaluation, including aggressive media campaigns, teen smoking cessation programmes, social environment changes, community interventions, and increasing cigarette prices. Lantz et al. Tobacco Control 2000: 9 (Spring)
The Department of Health invited comments on the Government’s proposal to raise the legal age for the purchase of tobacco from 16 to 18. It also proposes measures to strengthen sanctions against retailers who break the law. The consultation closed 2 October 2006.
This guidance covers mass media and point of sales measures only. The guidance stresses that these measures should be combined with other prevention strategies as part of a comprehensive tobacco control strategy.
By A Sowden and L Arblaster. Mass media campaign may deter some young people from starting smoking. Campaigns which have researched and developed their message have a higher success rate than those that did not. 26 October 1998
This report by the Health Development Agency (from 2005 the National Institute of Clinical Evidence) provides a systematic review of the evidence relating to interventions to prevent young people from starting to smoke. It also reviews interventions that work best to help smokers of all ages to quit. It suggests that some youth smoking prevention measures may be effective but the evidence for initiatives such as retail interventions is less clear. April 2004
Article in the Tobacco Control Journal that showed that the strategy used in the Florida campaign resulted in high rates of recall, significant changes in attitudes/beliefs, and reduced rates of smoking behaviour among youth. Tobacco Control 2001, 10 (Spring)
Cluster randomised controlled trial of expert system based on the stages of change model for smoking prevention and cessation in schools. The intervention in this trial was ineffective in schoolchildren aged 13-14. BMJ 9 October 1999
Short and inspired paper seeting out the reasons for the ineffectiveness of school-based youth-focussed intervention. Also has recommendation on what to do, if a schools programme absolutely has to run. By Anne Charlton 1999.
By Anne Landman, Pamela Ling, and Stanton A. Glantz. The authors conclude: The industry started these programs in the 1980s to forestall legislation that would restrict industry activities. Industry programs portray smoking as an adult choice and fail to discuss how tobacco advertising promotes smoking or the health dangers of smoking. The industry use these programs to fight taxes, clean-air laws, and marketing restrictions worldwide. There is no evidence that these programs decrease smoking among youths. American Journal of Public Health June 2002.
Structured like a console game, the site invites exploration of facts, myths and realities of tobacco - with excellent quotes and other resources.
This article sets out the seven principles behind Florida's youth smoking campaign. The author regards these principles as critical to its success. Hicks, J. Tobacco Control 2001: 10 (Spring)
BMJ Editoral by Donald Reid. Is it too much hope that this experiment marks the end of attempts to find a quick fix, school based solution to the problem of teenage smoking? If it is, these are disappointing findings will be of greater benefit to public health than they appear. March 1999.
Website by the Roy Castle Lung Foundation for children.







