| ASH news release: For immediate release: |
Victory for tobacco control campaigners sued for unearthing tobacco industry mole |
| Health campaigners worldwide are today celebrating the Swiss court's dismissal of libel claims made against two tobacco control campaigners who had accused an academic of being in the pay of the tobacco industry. Researchers Pascal Diethelm and Dr Jean-Charles Rielle had accused Professor Ragnar Rylander of infiltrating the In March 2001, a Geneva-based non-governmental organisation, OxyGenève, issued a report on the activities of Prof. Rylander, alleging unprecedented scientific fraud and labelling him as one of the highest paid consultants to the tobacco industry. Rylander sued for libel, maintaining his innocence and admitting only to limited links with the tobacco industry. He conceded that he had obtained some money for well-defined research projects, while asserting complete professional independence and specifically denying any contractual relationship. The documentation reviewed by the Swiss courts shows that these claims totally misrepresent the situation. Instead they reveal how he worked secretly for Philip Morris for almost three decades, receiving sums of up to US$150,000 per year. His secret contract with them was obtained during the proceedings; in 1972 he had written to Philip Morris that "Naturally all our joint work would be formally tied to a paragraph on secrecy… In ruling that the description of his work as unprecedented scientific fraud was justified, the Deborah Arnott, Director of the health campaigning charity ASH, said: Pascal Diethelm and Dr Rielle are to be congratulated for their courage in standing up to the might of the tobacco industry and for their dogged pursuit of truth. The Rylander Affair is just one of a shocking series of scandals involving Philip Morris's attempts to fudge the science on secondhand smoke. Professor Martin McKee, of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and editor of the European Journal of Public Health, said: This case demonstrates clearly how the tobacco companies cannot be trusted. It is yet another example of their underhand, deceptive practices. Thankfully, justice has been done and Philip Morris can no longer hide behind the pretence that Rylander was an impartial researcher. |
| Notes and links: [1] Background information about the Rylander case can be viewed at: www.prevention.ch/rylanderpm.htm (This includes press coverage (in French) and an editorial (in English) in the European Journal of Public Health. 2003; 13: 193-194. Also see: http://www.nisus.se/archive/020826e.html [2] Further information on Philip Morris's campaign to recruit scientists to promote controversy' around passive smoking can be viewed at: http://www.ash.org.uk/html/conduct/html/pmorris1.html [3] The full text of the judgment (in French) will be posted on the www.prevention.ch web site shortly after it becomes available on Monday 15 December. An English translation will be made available as from Wednesday 17 December on the same web site. |
| Contact: Professor Martin McKee 079 7383 2576 (m) |